Compliance with International Standards in Mexican and Guatemalan Peer-Reviewed Publishing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46780/sociedadcunzac.v2i1.18

Keywords:

international standards, scholarly journals, peer-reviewed, recently created, Mexico, Guatemala

Abstract

AIMS: To assess whether peer-reviewed scholarly journals recently created in Mexico and Guatemala comply with international standards. METHOD: This study employed a quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional research design. It was gathered a convenience sample that consisted of 20 electronic and peer-reviewed scholarly journals from Mexico and 10 from Guatemala that obtained their ISSN in 2021. RESULTS: It was found high scores on international standards such as the minimum required information on the journal’s website, editorial team, and articles’ metadata. However, there were moderate scores on minimum required information on articles, policy and journal’s guidelines, and privacy protection policy. Requirements to authors concerning the conduction of the study and journal’s metrics were among the standards with low scores. CONCLUSION: I concluded that peer-reviewed scholarly journals recently created comply with few international standards. I recommend that publishers consult experts to comply with all of them as soon as possible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Humberto Emilio Aguilera Arévalo, Universidad Masaryk, República Checa

Es doctor en Psicología Social por la Universidad Masaryk, República Checa. En la República Checa radicó por 16 años en donde fue docente e investigador en University of New York en Prague y Karlova Univerzita. Actualmente es investigador en diferentes líneas de investigación relativas a la cognición social, etnopsicología y representaciones sociales.

References

Baldwin, M. (2017). In referees we trust? Physics Today, 70(2), 44-49.

https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3463

Choi, H. W., Choi, Y. J., & Kim, S. (2019). Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals Science Editing, 6 (2), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.171

Committee on Publication Ethics, Directory of Open Access Journals, Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, & World Association of Medical Editors (2018). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. Committee on Publication Ethics.

https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.12

Directory of Open Access Journals (s.f.) Journal Records. [Data set]. Infrastructure Services for Open Access C.I.C. https://doaj.org/

Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. Discussion Paper. University of St Andrews.

Gillis, R., Betz, S., Chan, J., & Hatherill et al., J. (2019). Getting Found, Staying Found, Increasing Impact: Enhancing Readership and Preserving Content for OJS Journals, Second Edition. OJS På Dansk, 10 (9). https://doi.org/10.7146/ojssb.v10i9.116299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/ojssb.v10i9.116299

Graf, C., Wager, E., Bowman, A., Fiack, S., Scott-lichter, D., & Robinson, A. (2007). Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: A publisher’s perspective. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 61(suppl. 152), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01230.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01230.x

ISSN International Centre (s.f.). ISSN Records. [Data set]. ISSN International Centre. https://portal.issn.org/advancedsearch

Kelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., Adeli, K., & Biochemistry, C. (2014). Peer review in scientific publications: Benefits, critiques, & a survival guide. EJIFCC, 25(3), 227–243. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975196/

National Information Standards Organization (2010). Scientific and Technical Reports – Preparation, Presentation, and Preservation. National Information Standards Organization.

Ndungu, M. W. (2021). Scholarly journal publishing standards, policies and guidelines. Learned Publishing, 34, 612-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1410

Snyder, G. P., Blalock, E., Scott-lichter, D., Kahn, M., Blume, M., Mahar, J., Goodell, H., Morrissey, S., & Parrish, D. (2020). CSE’s white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal. Council of Science Editors.

Published

2022-01-20

How to Cite

Aguilera Arévalo, H. E. (2022). Compliance with International Standards in Mexican and Guatemalan Peer-Reviewed Publishing . Revista Académica Sociedad Del Conocimiento Cunzac, 2(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.46780/sociedadcunzac.v2i1.18

Issue

Section

Scientific Essays